With Kirpal Singh you immediately had the feeling and could have certain experiences, that led you to believe that he had brought his analysis to an end - though it might not be advantageous to apply psychoanalytic criteria in this instance -, and that he was authentic through and through, honest and true.
When I began my studies in psychoanalysis in the year 1969, I myself was very confused, which immediately led me to recognize the confusion in my teachers and colleagues - their confusion was only a different type. At that time, it seemed to be impossible for me to cope at the Akademie für Psychoanalyse in Munich. It cost me a great deal of effort to follow through with my studies. So when I first became acquainted with Kirpal Singh in 1971 (and met him in person in 1972),
Every riddle, every auspicious event, everything that is in any way an immediate SHINES / SPEAKS is a kind of ‘assignment’. The riddle, which is – as Lacan says – the „summit of sense“, requires a solution. It is straightforward urgency, and pronounces the ‘assignment’ to: „Solve me! “. But the Other’s ‘assignment’ is quite a special event.
Is this the secret of Sach Kand? It cannot be said by scientific research. Either we understand it as a condition of hypomania or it deals with what we do when, in psychoanalysis, we go back to birth and attempt to reconstruct the images of earliest experiences and use them for cognition?
Repetition of the ‚loaded names’ can only invoke, address, evoke something, and it is obvious, that such can only originate in the sonority, or sonorous verbalism, of the names themselves. For example, a further word similar to the Sanskrit names could emerge as a lucid echo of the mentally repeated words and names.
